Agree with #3. I came upon your blog – I think it was a couple of years ago – and have been reading it since. The posts were not so frequent then, but still very insightful. Judging by the number of comments, your readership has picked up quite a bit since late last year – you’ve made several very acute observations.
Frankly, I haven’t enjoyed any of the posts in wallstreetexaminer – not sure wny. Perhaps in theroxylandr.wordpress.com blog, you write when you feel you have something to say. On wallstreetexaminer, you might be a little under pressure to perform?
Anonymous, thanks, I think you’ve nailed it. I’m trying to write like it’s Wall street journal or something, but I’m not getting more brains no matter where I’m posting
Roxy, for me it is not the content, it is the site itself. To be honest, the page is SO busy with advertising it is difficult to identify your post much less read it. I am suprised no one has not had a seizure with all the flashing content.
Certainly this crowd will be dissappointed with the more mainstream venue. To expect otherwise would be foolish.
My beef is that I can’t read the entire article in the RSS feed (on my phone) as I could with this site.
The new venue sacrifices content for ad revenue. I’m sympathetic to the dilemma, but I just wanted to put it out there.
I just never get around to reading your articles after I see the first few sentences in the feed. Then again, if you’ve picked up more readers I support the move.
May 25, 2008 at 3:24 pm
The link is broken
“Failure To Connect To Web Server”
May 26, 2008 at 6:42 pm
I’m missing old posters from this board at the new place – Tech Guy, Darth Toll and others. I’d love to see you again!
May 27, 2008 at 10:19 am
I think your decision to move to wallstreetexaminer was a mistake. Your column there does not have the same feel.
I recommend you switch back, learnt a lot from your and thanks for that.
May 28, 2008 at 1:16 pm
Roxy,
Agree with #3. I came upon your blog – I think it was a couple of years ago – and have been reading it since. The posts were not so frequent then, but still very insightful. Judging by the number of comments, your readership has picked up quite a bit since late last year – you’ve made several very acute observations.
Frankly, I haven’t enjoyed any of the posts in wallstreetexaminer – not sure wny. Perhaps in theroxylandr.wordpress.com blog, you write when you feel you have something to say. On wallstreetexaminer, you might be a little under pressure to perform?
May 28, 2008 at 9:47 pm
Anonymous, thanks, I think you’ve nailed it. I’m trying to write like it’s Wall street journal or something, but I’m not getting more brains no matter where I’m posting
I’ll make it more entertaining
May 29, 2008 at 1:22 am
Roxy, for me it is not the content, it is the site itself. To be honest, the page is SO busy with advertising it is difficult to identify your post much less read it. I am suprised no one has not had a seizure with all the flashing content.
Keep it simple.
May 30, 2008 at 10:59 pm
The ads are out of my control – you may see that Russ Winter is running the same ads in the same place. You may filter them out, tsss…
May 30, 2008 at 11:47 pm
Certainly this crowd will be dissappointed with the more mainstream venue. To expect otherwise would be foolish.
My beef is that I can’t read the entire article in the RSS feed (on my phone) as I could with this site.
The new venue sacrifices content for ad revenue. I’m sympathetic to the dilemma, but I just wanted to put it out there.
I just never get around to reading your articles after I see the first few sentences in the feed. Then again, if you’ve picked up more readers I support the move.