Russ Winter just ran this chart:
To illustrate the inflow of money into commodity trades, but he did not explain how it works and why it leads by itself into price increase. This could be obvious for some people but I feel that I need to explain, just in case.
There is a fundamental difference between stock market and commodity market. You can buy and hold any stock as long as the company exists (when company goes belly up you can say the stock “expired”).
In opposite, at the commodity market everything expires and is temporary. There are two markets – spot and futures. At spot market you buy for quick delivery of physical, at futures market you buy the contract for future delivery. Every single physical is traded at the market either for immediate or future delivery and every future contract is eventually replaced by physical delivery.
When the “investment” money come to markets they either buy at spot (unlikely) or buy futures (more likely), because why would they stockpile physical if they don’t really need it? If they buy futures they need to roll-over those futures every month to avoid the delivery of physical. If the amount of “investment” money at the market is constant they just re-invest into new futures at every expiration and that does not affect prices.
However, it the amount of “investment” money is growing, the amount of futures sold at every expiration is replaced by increased amount of new futures, i.e. the demand for futures is fundamentally increasing. But that’s not all.
The final consumers of every commodity are expecting the futures to trade at discount to current spot price, because the commodity seller is getting his money early, which is effectively a credit. The discount of futures to current spot price is normal and is just the cost of money. However, if new “investors” are interfering with prices that could elevate the price of futures comparing to spot. The reaction of final consumers is simple: they will buy less futures and buy more physical. When they buy more physical then they really need the inventory grow and prices go up.
Thus, the inflow of “investment” money into commodities markets automatically lead into price increases. There is no other way, this is just simple math. The inventory build-up is not so transparent as it could, because the producers of intermediate goods may take more crude goods than they really need and produce more output. It might be cheaper to stockpile processed goods, they probably take less space and are less perishable. But the producers of final goods may also expect the prices to increase and produce more of final goods than the market demands. So the stockpiling of products may happen at all levels and in different countries, so it is impossible to properly track and quantify those excesses.
Russ Winter chart shows the constant inflow of funds “invested” into commodities. I take “investment” into quotes because of the fundamental difference. While at stock markets investment means ownership of something permanent, at commodities markets “investment” means some traders are stuck with futures between producers and consumers. Every month, those traders transfer this temporary ownership to consumers and buy more from producers, which leads into price increase and inventory build-up.
I think, unless the demand is growing faster than those capital inflows, we have a classic financial pyramid that is fed by inflow of new money. At one point in future this process will be exhausted and the money will start to flow out. That means that at expiration time the sellers will dominate buyers and final producers will rather burn out inventories then buy new stuff. That will make commodities to go down at the quite impressive speed. When it will happen? I have no idea

April 8, 2008 at 7:56 pm
One question: Is this money inflow, or total invested in commodities? Total invested will increase even with no inflow if the value of the commodity is going up or the dollar is going down.
Simple example would be gold, if the fund started at $600, the value of the fund would be up about 60% at this time.
You need to take Russ’s chart, and multiply the vertical values by DXY in either case. Dollars are meaningless.
Course what do I know, I am invested in DBV.
April 8, 2008 at 8:18 pm
A very good write-up, and thanks for your insight.
God bless you.
April 9, 2008 at 10:15 am
can u explain why many stocks market going down right now ?
April 9, 2008 at 10:32 am
Thanks!
April 9, 2008 at 8:44 pm
Roxy,
Let me add a little on the side-effects of the speculative in-flows to commodities.
I did consulting work for a small manufacturer that consumed about $1m of metals a year. In the early aughts as prices began rising, the purchasing manager began excess purchasing. His thinking was to lock in current prices.
By the time I left the place, the Purchaser had acquired about 4 years inventory of certain metals – particularly copper, brass, titanium, hi-tech nickel alloys and some obscure stainless grades. Seriously, 4 YEARS of inventory.
When prices begin to decline he will unwind this inventory. My guess is he will wind down to about 3 months. The implication of this is he may not place substantial orders for any of this material for going on 3.75 years.
If this activity is repeated at thousands of small fab shops around the world, once purchasers perceive prices are downtrending dis-hoarded of inventory will have a catastrophic effect of metals pricing.
April 9, 2008 at 11:09 pm
Eventhorizon, amazing. Metals are easy to stockpile, uh?
April 9, 2008 at 11:14 pm
Eventhorizon
You are on to why if you are investing in commodities, that metals are terrible. They are not destroyed through decay, and are easy to inventory, especially precious metals.
You absolutely right about PMs doing this everywhere. You cannot do this with Chicago, Minneapolis or KC wheat, at least not for more than one year. Similarly for all grains.
Metals are very difficult to speculate on. They are far too easy to horde. Grain futures can be very difficult to corner, there are all sorts of gadgets in place to provide orderly contract closure.
April 10, 2008 at 2:49 pm
OT: Obseedian just weighed in on the Libor action as of late with this hypothesis:
“some big bank in Euroland had just brought back a bunch of USD denominated SIV assets on its books, took a nasty loss in the process, and is now net short FRNs. So they are either liquidating EUR/GBP assets or borrowing GBP/EUR and selling in the open market to cover off USD deposit liabilities. LIBOR is spiking because suddenly this bank has no FRNs to lend, reducing supply.”
Thought this was worthy of mention.
http://www.tickerforum.org/cgi-ticker/akcs-www?post=39387&page=8
April 10, 2008 at 10:30 pm
I’m going to speculate that there is another aspect of commodity speculation that has gone on underappreciated: commodities are uncomplicated, easy to understand, and uniform in quality/consistency.
So much of our current economic peril has to do with “the exotic”: Financial instruments that are so profoundly complicated that nobody of reasonable intelligence can wrap their head around them. Commodities are the comfort food of the financial industry.
April 11, 2008 at 1:36 am
Darth,
There is perhaps another answer: There may be plenty of dollars, but no one wants to lend them to a bankrupt bank. Unless it is a Guido loan. Did this bank perhaps go to Italy for help with its LIBOR borrowing?
We are in a liquidity trap. Money money everywhere, but not a dollar to borrow.
No one is creditworthy.
April 17, 2008 at 11:39 am
I need to make a big clarification. My post does not imply that commodity price increase are mostly explained by speculation – not at all.
What I’m saying is that any speculation is forcing the price to go up, but it’s impossible to separate speculation effect from supply-demand effect.
I think speculation is very important, but I can’t say how much.
July 12, 2010 at 3:17 am
[...] Useful post on how commodity speculation works [...]
October 17, 2010 at 3:57 pm
really great site, keep up the good work as the internet really needs more good site like this. il bookmark your site
April 4, 2011 at 11:25 pm
Wouldn’t the speculators lose money once new money stops flowing in and hoarded inventory is sold off/consumed? Someone has to be left without a chair when the music stops right?
November 29, 2011 at 12:37 am
Investment Austin…
[...]How commodity speculation works « The Theroxylandr in Flame[...]…
March 14, 2012 at 10:24 am
suzuki motorcycles…
[...]How commodity speculation works « The Theroxylandr in Flame[...]…
March 21, 2012 at 9:24 am
furniture stores mn…
[...]How commodity speculation works « The Theroxylandr in Flame[...]…